Nvidia envisage un financement de 250 milliards de dollars pour le centre de données d'OpenAI en Ohio - la dette fournisseur atteint une nouvelle échelle

In plain terms - Nvidia is talking to banks about backing OpenAI's Ohio megacampus with roughly $250 billion of financial support. The chipmaker would help fund the buyer that then buys its chips - vendor financing at hyperscale.

Context

Tech in Asia and ETNews report simultaneous talks: ~$250B ($350 trillion KRW in the Korean read) of Nvidia-supported financing for OpenAI's Ohio site. The facility itself is a 10-gigawatt campus at Pike County, Ohio, developed by SB Energy (SoftBank's energy subsidiary); the Nvidia backing is a backstop that helps OpenAI LEASE the site, not build it. This lands on top of Nvidia's already-announced $500B SK Group partnership and $10B Naver investment (25 July 2026), which already stretched the definition of a chip supplier.

The data

• Reported envelope: up to ~$250B (Tech in Asia, 27 July 2026)
• Corroborated by ETNews (350 trillion KRW ≈ $250B at ~1,400 KRW/USD)
• Site: 10 GW campus, Pike County, Ohio, developed by SB Energy (SoftBank)
• Nvidia's role: financial backstop for OpenAI's lease of the facility
• Structure: not disclosed - banks in the loop suggest syndication rather than direct Nvidia balance-sheet lending

Analysis

The circular capital pattern that ratings agencies have been flagging (Oracle downgrade, June-July) now has a headline number. Nvidia is no longer just selling accelerators; it is co-underwriting the balance sheet capacity of the biggest buyer of those accelerators. Every dollar of vendor-supported debt keeps GPU orders flowing, but it also concentrates counterparty risk on a single supplier-customer axis.

Scenarios

• Base: talks yield a syndicated structure where Nvidia takes a subordinated slice; banks and infrastructure funds carry the senior debt.
• Adverse: markets price the circularity as tech-sector systemic risk; Nvidia's own cost of capital rises and cascades into OpenAI's build timeline.

Under the hood

The parallel drawn by market observers is dot-com telecom vendor financing (Lucent, Nortel, Global Crossing). What is different here is scale: a single-site backstop at $250B is orders of magnitude above anything documented in that era, and it comes wrapped around a lease structure, not a direct capex loan.

So what

For decision-makers: any capex plan that assumes stable GPU access should now be stress-tested against a scenario where Nvidia's willingness or ability to underwrite customers tightens. The compute market's price signal is being partly synthesized by its dominant seller.