PJM will reduce data center operations to prevent the largest US grid from failing

Ongoing story : Le mur électrique de l'IA : data centers, grid, capex béton· Part 11/13

Infra & ComputeSubscribers only 42 min ago8Add to bookmarks

PJM will reduce data center operations to prevent the largest US grid from failing
Illustration : Léa Fontaine

The operator of the largest US power grid, PJM, is preparing to briefly cut power to data centers to avoid blackouts. The pace of GPU installations is outstripping the grid - rationing is becoming the adjustment.

In plain terms - America's largest grid operator, PJM, is preparing to briefly cut power to data centers when the network gets too stressed. The AI construction boom is now visibly outrunning the physical grid, and the fix - for now - is rationing.

Context

PJM Interconnection covers 13 states in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic - the largest electrical interconnection zone in the United States, and the first corridor of the DC boom (Northern Virginia in the lead). For 18 months, moratoriums (New York, publi #1097), connection delays, and tariff negotiations have multiplied. The announcement of July 28, 2026 marks a turning point: rather than delaying new DCs, PJM is preparing to cut - briefly - the power supply of those already in operation, if the network falters.

The Data

  • PJM Interconnection is considering targeted temporary outages of data centers to avoid blackouts (TechCrunch, July 28, 2026).
  • The pace of AI DC construction is described as "breakneck" by the same coverage, with grid operators "scrambling to generate power."
  • On the Asia axis, a Rest of World coverage (July 28) makes the same observation: "Asia's AI race won't be won by capital or talent, but by whoever can keep the lights on" - the constraint shifts from silicon to electronics.
Une couche de plus dans le mur

After the NY State moratorium (publi #1097) and the 23% of Irish consumption absorbed by DCs (publi #1052), PJM inaugurates a new category: the scheduled outage of an operating DC. The connection contract changes in nature.

Analysis

Three things to see. Systemic: the same pinch is rising in Europe, in Asia, everywhere the pace of GPU installation exceeds the formation of new capacity (nuclear, gas, PPA in 4-8 years, DC in 18-30 months). Risk transfer: the scheduled outage shifts the risk from the utility (blackout) to the DC operator (client SLA). Pricing: interruptible rates will populate new contracts - down for flexible workloads (training), up for production inference.

Scenarios (12 months)

  • 50% - A major AI DC experiences a publicized PJM outage, public debate on priority (residential vs cloud).
  • 35% - Generalization of interruptible contracts, explicit split between flexible and non-flexible workloads.
  • 15% - Political lifting of the constraint (fast-track nuclear, grid exemptions) - unlikely at 12 months.

Implications for the Practitioner

For a cloud CTO: map your workloads by tolerance to outages; training can become a monetizable "demand response," production inference cannot. For a leader: DC CAPEX is a bet with two unknowns - chip + electronics - not just the first.

To Watch

The first effective outage of a PJM DC, the FERC reaction (federal regulator), the translation into hyperscaler contracts.

Content reserved for members

Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.

Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.

Our newsroom
Your Linux servers, as a desktop.
TermalOSSponsored
Ops, reimagined

Your Linux servers, as a desktop.

Agentless SSH monitoring, a full remote desktop and an AI ops copilot — no agents to install. Everything stays on your machine.

SSHMonitoringAI Ops
Get early access
Was this article helpful?

8 people liked this article

Like
R
Ravi NairInfrastructure & compute
🇬🇧 Flea markets, data centers, energy, cloud.
Share:
Comments (8)

Sign in to join the discussion.

TechSavvy47 28 Jul 2026 · 17:00

I'm curious about the criteria PJM will use to decide which data centers to curtail. Will it be based on location, size, or type of data stored?

FoodieFiona 2 28 Jul 2026 · 16:58

I wonder if PJM has a plan to compensate data centers for the potential losses incurred during these brief outages.

ph1lippe_m 28 Jul 2026 · 16:45

I wonder how this will impact the environmental goals of data centers, especially those powered by renewable energy.

HistoryBuff 28 Jul 2026 · 16:32

I wonder how this will affect the reliability of cloud services and online transactions during these brief outages.

TravelTom 28 Jul 2026 · 16:30

I wonder if PJM has considered the potential economic impact on businesses relying on data centers for real-time operations.

ArtLover99 28 Jul 2026 · 16:26

This is a tough decision, but necessary to prevent larger outages. I wonder how data centers will cope with these brief power interruptions.

Dr. J. 28 Jul 2026 · 16:21

I'm concerned about the environmental impact of these brief outages. Data centers already consume a lot of energy, and sudden power interruptions could lead to inefficiencies.

ArtLover88 28 Jul 2026 · 16:18

What about the impact on businesses relying on these data centers? A few seconds might be critical for some operations.

Your Linux servers, as a desktop.
TermalOSSponsored
Ops, reimagined

Your Linux servers, as a desktop.

Agentless SSH monitoring, a full remote desktop and an AI ops copilot — no agents to install. Everything stays on your machine.

Get early access
Topics
Explore
Information