Uber -10%, Monday.com -20%, Amazon cuts in its AI: the wave of layoffs "to fund AI" is in full swing

Ongoing story : Impact de l'IA sur le travail : exposition, augmentation, déplacement· Part 3/3

Society & PolicySubscribers only 1 h ago6Add to bookmarks

Uber -10%, Monday.com -20%, Amazon cuts in its AI: the wave of layoffs "to fund AI" is in full swing
Illustration : Léa Fontaine

Three announcements on the same day, a shared reason - AI is no longer an additional expense item, it becomes a replacement item.

In plain terms

On July 23, 2026, three very different companies announced pay cuts on the same day, with the same justification: to fund, accelerate, or refound around AI. Uber cuts approximately 10% in its customer operations. Monday.com announces 20% of its workforce will be reduced to fund its AI push. Amazon announces cuts in its AI division itself.

Context

The ai-labor-impact thread has so far followed the exposure (ILO ASEAN report, exposure studies). Exposure becomes observable displacement. Three companies, three different logics - customer service, SaaS, AI division of a hyperscaler - converge on the same basis: the cuts are explicitly presented as an AI trade-off.

The data

  • Uber: ~10% of positions in customer service operations.
  • Monday.com: ~20% of the workforce, with an explicit narrative "fund the AI push".
  • Amazon: cuts in the AI division - a rarer and more revealing case (see below).

Analysis

Two distinct dynamics intersect. Substitution (Uber, high-volume repetitive sectors): AI replaces an identifiable task, the calculation is direct ROI. Reallocation (Monday.com): the company cuts to fund an AI product pivot - the logic is capex-to-opex-to-product. Internal consolidation (Amazon): cutting within its own AI division signals that even AI-native organizations are entering a phase of budget discipline.

This third case is the most significant. It reminds us that the 2024-2025 AI hiring wave was partly exuberant, and that 2026 is the year of rationalization within the field itself.

Scenarios

  • Base: The pace of announcements accelerates in Q3 2026, with a mix of substitution/reallocation.
  • High: A Fortune 100 company announces a cut >15% explicitly linked to AI - a media moment.
  • Low: Macro slowdown that makes it impossible to distinguish "AI" cuts from cyclical cuts.

Risks

Disputes (see algorithmic-management thread) if selection criteria are algorithmic; impact on public continuing education; political response in the most exposed jurisdictions.

Under the hood

Three technical observations. (1) The jobs first affected (level 1 support, repetitive ops) are those where LLM + RAG covers most of the repetitive volume. (2) A "20% cut to fund AI" is often a managerial cut preceded by a two-to-three quarter hiring freeze. (3) Intra-AI cuts (Amazon) reflect a consolidation of roles - fewer researchers, more platform engineers.

So what

For leaders: build your HR narrative before product comms does it for you. For exposed employees: the next six quarters will be the media peak of this wave - it's also the period where public and political attention is maximal, hence support for retraining.

Content reserved for members

Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.

Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.

Our newsroom
Your Linux servers, as a desktop.
TermalOSSponsored
Ops, reimagined

Your Linux servers, as a desktop.

Agentless SSH monitoring, a full remote desktop and an AI ops copilot — no agents to install. Everything stays on your machine.

SSHMonitoringAI Ops
Get early access
Was this article helpful?

6 people liked this article

Like
Y
Yara NasserSociety & politics
🇬🇧 Ethics, regulation, work, governance.
Share:
Comments (6)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Alex 2 23 Jul 2026 · 05:25

AI is reshaping the job market, but is this the most ethical way to drive innovation? Companies should consider the human impact.

HistoryBuff 23 Jul 2026 · 05:13

It's a tough balance. AI can boost efficiency, but at what cost to human jobs? Let's hope companies find a middle ground.

FoodieChicago 23 Jul 2026 · 05:05

AI is inevitable, but companies should invest in retraining programs to help displaced workers adapt.

J.P.R. 3 23 Jul 2026 · 04:57

Is AI really saving costs or just shifting them? Who pays for the retraining and social safety nets when jobs are replaced?

ArtLover88 23 Jul 2026 · 04:30

AI is a tool, not a replacement. It's about how we use it to augment human potential, not just cut costs.

Critique42 23 Jul 2026 · 04:13

Is this the future of work? AI replacing jobs is a scary thought.

Story timeline

Impact de l'IA sur le travail : exposition, augmentation, déplacement

  1. 1**OIT: Generative AI to impact 80 million workers in ASEAN, no mass layoffs expected**15/07/2026
  2. 2China's AI labor report: 21 million jobs restructured, not replaced - the story is displacement within companies22/07/2026
  3. 3Uber -10%, Monday.com -20%, Amazon cuts in its AI: the wave of layoffs "to fund AI" is in full swing23/07/2026
Your Linux servers, as a desktop.
TermalOSSponsored
Ops, reimagined

Your Linux servers, as a desktop.

Agentless SSH monitoring, a full remote desktop and an AI ops copilot — no agents to install. Everything stays on your machine.

Get early access
Topics
Explore
Information