TransitionSubscribers only Jun 23, 2026 at 02:454Add to bookmarks

In 2020, Tesla and BYD announced the end of cobalt in their batteries. In 2026, production data tells a different story - and the DRC remains the hub of all vulnerabilities.
Since 2020, EV manufacturers have heavily promoted the shift away from cobalt in favor of LFP (lithium-iron-phosphate) batteries-safer, cheaper, and less exposed to the DRC. Tesla switched its standard-range models to LFP; BYD launched its "Blade" battery. The dominant narrative concludes that the EV sector is now resilient to cobalt shocks. This is a dangerous oversimplification.
The shift to LFP has reduced cobalt dependence for entry-level EVs, but not for three fast-growing segments: premium EVs (where NMC’s superior energy density is essential), long-duration stationary storage, and electric aviation. Moreover, extreme geographic concentration creates an underestimated systemic risk: China controls ~80% of refining, allowing it to tax or embargo refined cobalt regardless of DRC production. A cobalt shock wouldn’t take 6 months to materialize-it would take 6 weeks.
DRC cobalt oversupply + growth of recycled cobalt (Umicore, Redwood Materials) keeps prices below $40,000/t, no crisis through 2026-2027.
DRC instability (as in 2018) or Chinese export embargo cuts supply for 6-12 months, cobalt spike to $60,000-80,000/t, NMC automaker margins collapse.
Accelerated adoption of sodium-ion (CATL Na-ion) or solid-state batteries eliminates premium cobalt by 2028-2030, structural downward pressure on prices.
The current low price (~$33,000/t) offers a window to build exposure to producers: Glencore (LSE: GLEN), China Molybdenum (HK: 3993). But DRC geopolitical risk demands a risk premium: limited positions (<3% of a diversified portfolio), defined stop-loss. Avoid premium EV manufacturers overly exposed to NMC without secured long-term cobalt supply contracts.
The primary risk is not mining but geopolitical: a Chinese embargo on refined cobalt would be more devastating than a mining crisis in the DRC, as it would simultaneously cut battery production for all non-vertically integrated manufacturers. This risk is nearly absent from current valuation models.
Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.
Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Cutting cobalt in press releases is easy. Cutting it in gigafactories? That’s where the supply chain laughs last.
2020-2026 : six ans pour réaliser que les promesses sans cobalt, c’était du marketing. La RDC rit jaune, les actionnaires moins.
Les batteries LFP progressent, mais le cobalt reste dans les cathodes NCM. La vraie solution ? Recycler 90% des batteries en fin de vie d’ici 2030.
Promises, promises... until the supply chain map lights up red again. When will we stop pretending?