Ground à l'instant6Ajouter aux favoris

Naver's Mate program compensates creators whose content the AI Briefing cites - one month later, citations to partner creators jumped 48.3%, with AI Briefing now serving 27% of searches. A working answer to the traffic-collapse problem.
Naver has published month-over-month numbers on Naver Mate, the program that pays creators whose posts its AI Briefing cites. Citations to Mate partners rose from 355.82 million in April to 528.02 million in May 2026 - a 48.3% jump. AI Briefing now accounts for 27% of Naver's total search queries, up from 20% in December 2025; the target is 40% by year-end. Roughly 3,000 creators are selected monthly across blogs, cafes, Knowledge iN and premium content, with a base stipend of ₩300,000/month and top performers earning up to ₩10 million.
Google and Reddit are fighting the AI-scraper question in court. Naver is running the opposite experiment: license the citation flow, price it, and see if creators stay. The 48% jump suggests the answer, at least in Korean-language search, is "yes." The interesting number isn't the citations - it's the 27% share of queries served through AI Briefing. That's a live measurement of how quickly a national search engine is being reshaped by generative summaries, in a market where the platform still controls the creator relationship.
Whether the 40% year-end target holds as Naver pushes AI Briefing into shopping and vertical queries - today's mix is heavily general knowledge. And whether the Mate economics scale: 3,000 creators is manageable, but the traffic loss lives in the long tail.
Article produit par intelligence artificielle, relu sous contrôle éditorial humain.
Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.
Great initiative, but how does Naver ensure the quality of cited content?
This is a great way to support creators, but I wonder how sustainable this model is in the long run.
This seems like a smart move by Naver to keep creators engaged with their AI platform.
I wonder how Naver plans to handle cases where cited content is outdated or inaccurate after compensation.
I'm curious how Naver plans to scale this program as AI Briefing's usage grows. Will they continue to compensate creators at the same rate?
Interesting approach. Wonder if this model could work for other AI platforms too.
Corée : le supercycle IA — Nvidia, SK, Naver, tournée présidentielle