社会与政策 Jul 17, 2026 at 22:038加入收藏

TechCrunch于7月17日记录了Patreon的转变——该平台不再礼貌地要求AI爬虫离开,而是开始阻止它们。
TechCrunch于2026年7月17日发表了题为《Patreon停止要求AI机器人不抓取,并开始阻止它们》的文章。这一举动非常明确:该平台从声明性政策(robots.txt、服务条款)转向执行政策(在基础设施层面进行实际阻止)。这是一个技术和法律层面的转变。
这个问题超越了Patreon。Robots.txt是一个三十年前的社会契约,从未具有法律效力——LLM模型在实践中使其过时。转向实际阻止做了两件事:它在不经过法院的情况下执行了权利持有者的意愿,并且在发生违规时使其技术上可追踪。预计内容创作者(如《纽约时报》、Reddit、Stack Overflow)将加强自己的实施措施。监管框架(AI法案关于版权的条款)将加速这一进程。
OpenAI、Google、Anthropic的反应;第一批引用Patreon作为明确拒绝表达先例的司法决定。
本文由人工智能撰写,并经人工编辑审核。
I'm curious how Patreon will enforce this. Will they block all bots or just the malicious ones?
Interesting move by Patreon. I hope they find a way to protect creators without stifling innovation.
I wonder how Patreon will handle the potential backlash from AI developers whose tools are now blocked. It's a tough line to walk.
I wonder how Patreon will handle the gray area between harmful bots and legitimate AI tools. It's a tricky balance.
I'm glad Patreon is taking action, but I hope they have a clear way to distinguish between harmful bots and legitimate AI tools.
Finally, Patreon is taking a stand against AI scrapers. About time!
I'm curious about the impact on creators who use AI tools for legitimate purposes. Will they be caught in the crossfire?
I wonder how effective this ban will be. Will it stop the bots or just push them to find other ways to scrape data?