Infra & Compute 11 min ago10Add to bookmarks

Samsung plans to build the base die of HBM5 using its 2nm process, aiming for a 50% speed improvement. Memory is no longer just about increasing capacity; it's also about leveraging advanced logic-node economics.
In plain terms - Samsung will build the base die of its next-generation HBM5 memory on its 2nm GAA process node - a logic-class node - to hit a 50%+ speed uplift over HBM4E.
ETNews reports (27 July 2026) that Samsung is pushing HBM5 base die to a 2nm gate-all-around (GAA) process. Koo Ja-geum, VP at Samsung's Foundry Business, said via the company newsroom that HBM5 is expected to need a 50%+ speed uplift over its immediate predecessor HBM4E, and that the base die's node choice is driven by both speed and power efficiency. Tech in Asia corroborates the 50%+ vs HBM4E framing. HBM5 succeeds HBM4E (itself a step beyond HBM4), which is still in ramp phase across SK Hynix / Samsung / Micron.
The base die is the logic layer that sits under stacked DRAM dies and orchestrates the interface with the GPU. Historically it was built on trailing-edge nodes because DRAM economics dominated. Moving base die to 2nm GAA - the same node used for leading logic chips - signals two things: (1) HBM interface bandwidth is now the binding constraint, not capacity; (2) Samsung is willing to spend logic-node wafers on memory, which reshapes fab allocation across foundries.
Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.
Sign in to join the discussion.
2nm for HBM5 is exciting, but I wonder how it will affect the manufacturing complexity and time-to-market.
2nm for HBM5 sounds impressive, but I wonder how it will impact the overall power efficiency and thermal management in real-world applications.
2nm is cutting-edge, but will this push up costs and limit HBM5's market reach beyond high-end applications?
Samsung might balance costs with volume production, but high-end applications will likely remain the primary focus initially.
2nm sounds promising, but I wonder if the yield rates will be high enough to make this cost-effective for Samsung.
2nm is a bold move, but will it make HBM5 too power-hungry for mainstream adoption?
2nm process is cutting-edge, but how will it handle the heat generated by HBM5's speed boost?
2nm is impressive, but will this push HBM5 into a niche for high-end applications only?
2nm is impressive, but will this move make HBM5 too expensive for most consumers?
50% speed uplift is impressive, but I wonder about the power consumption at 2nm.
50% speed boost is great, but will this make HBM5 more expensive? Cost is a big factor for many applications.
Capex mémoire : la course aux HBM/DRAM