Markets
Data loading…
Live
News
No recent dispatches

Tungsten: Seoul Revives Its Mines to Break Free from China's Monopoly on a War Metal

Ongoing story : Rare Earths & Critical Minerals: The American Sovereignty Strategy· Part 5/5

TransitionSubscribers only 22 h ago5Add to bookmarks

Tungsten: Seoul Revives Its Mines to Break Free from China's Monopoly on a War Metal
Illustration : Anouk Verhoeven

South Korea reactivates its tungsten deposits to reduce a dependence on China exceeding 65%. A discreet but structural signal in the global recomposition of critical supply chains—the metal of hard tools and munitions enters the geopolitical battle.

Context

South Korea is reviving its tungsten mines—a critical metal for hard alloys (tungsten carbide), munitions, and precision electronics—to reduce its dependence on Chinese exports, which have historically accounted for over 65% of South Korea's supplies. China controls ~80% of global production, making tungsten one of Beijing's least visible but most powerful geopolitical levers.

Data

  • Global tungsten production: China ~80% (USGS 2025 source)
  • South Korean imports from China: ~65-70% historically
  • Sangdong Mine (South Korea): one of the largest tungsten deposits outside China – operator: Almonty Industries (AII.TO)
  • APT (ammonium paratungstate) price: ~330-340 $/MTU (2026, Metal Bulletin reference)
  • Chinese export restrictions on critical minerals: gallium/germanium (2023), rare earths (2025), trend extending to other strategic metals
  • Japan: clothing imports from China at their lowest in 31 years – macro signal of global geoeconomic decoupling

Analysis

Tungsten highlights the silent vulnerability of industrial economies: a concentrated metal, difficult to substitute in the short term, essential for precision machining, drill bits, and armor-piercing munitions (kinetic penetrators). The reactivation of Sangdong is not insignificant—it signals that Seoul is factoring supply disruption risks into its industrial planning, similar to U.S. strategies on rare earths. It is part of a broader diversification trend accelerating since China's 2023 gallium/germanium restrictions: Europe (Portugal, Spain), Canada, and Australia also have tungsten projects under development.

The analogy with lithium is instructive: when alternatives ramp up, China floods the market to keep prices low and deter competitors—a strategy documented with LFP (down 70% since 2022). The same risk exists for tungsten.

Probability-weighted scenarios

  • Sangdong ramps up by 2028-2029 (40%): South Korean dependence reduced below 40%, strong signal for Japanese and European buyers. APT prices stabilized outside Chinese control.
  • China imposes tungsten export restrictions (35%): APT price >400 $/MTU, acceleration of alternative investments in Europe and the Americas. Almonty Industries valued at a premium.
  • Capex difficulties and production delays (25%): China maintains leverage through predatory pricing; alternative projects stagnate due to short-term unprofitability.

Portfolio implications

Almonty Industries (AII.TO)

Direct exposure to Sangdong via long-term financing agreement.

Kennametal (KMT) & Sandvik (SAND.ST)

Tungsten carbide tool manufacturers, indirect beneficiaries of supply chain security.

Multi-year theme: reducing dependence on Chinese minerals is a cross-party political priority in South Korea, Japan, and the EU—sustained regulatory support.

Risks & blind spots

High capex costs to reopen closed mines. Unavoidable production ramp-up delays (3-5 years minimum). China could lower export prices to deter alternatives—as it did with lithium. Taiwan-China tensions could trigger unilateral restrictions but also create a sudden shortage before alternatives are operational.

To monitor

Sangdong production Q3-Q4 2026 · Tungsten APT price · EU updated critical materials list decision · New Chinese export restrictions on strategic metals · UK/EU mining strategy H2 2026

Content reserved for members

Create a free account to access all our content and the weekly review.

Article produced by artificial intelligence, reviewed under human editorial control.

Our newsroom
Was this article helpful?

5 people liked this article

Like
Lucia FerrazÉconomiste transition & matières critiques (São Paulo)
Elle suit les matières premières de la transition : lithium, cuivre, uranium, terres rares.
Share:
Comments (5)

Sign in to join the discussion.

CurioBretagne 04 Jul 2026 · 04:48

Et si la vraie bataille était moins le tungstène que le savoir-faire perdu pour l’extraire proprement ? Les mines coréennes rouvrent, mais les ingénieurs de 1990 sont à la retraite.

ekonomist_74 04 Jul 2026 · 04:38

Интересный шаг, но сколько времени уйдёт на выход на самоокупаемость? Без госсубсидий тут не обойтись.

eco_analista_BCN 04 Jul 2026 · 07:08

La dependencia de subsidios podría distorsionar el mercado: ¿no sería más eficiente invertir en reciclaje de tungsteno que en minas nuevas?

le_sceptique 04 Jul 2026 · 04:12

65 % de dépendance, c’est du suicide industriel lent. Mais rouvrir des mines fermées depuis 30 ans, ça va coûter cher et prendre des années. Qui paie la note ?

Ph. Renard 03 Jul 2026 · 17:22

Enfin un pays qui bouge sur les métaux stratégiques, ça fait du bien de voir autre chose que des discours.

Finanz_Fuchs 03 Jul 2026 · 19:37

Interessant, aber ob Seouls Eigenförderung wirklich gegen Chinas Preisdumping ankommt, bleibt fraglich - die Skaleneffekte sind einfach zu groß.

tessa_london 04 Jul 2026 · 07:00

It’s a start, but let’s see if Seoul can scale production fast enough to make a real dent in China’s grip.

J.P.R. 03 Jul 2026 · 17:05

Smart move, but how long until China retaliates with export controls on other rare earths? The tech supply chain’s still a house of cards.

Topics
Explore
Information