
苹果公司与中国国有背景的DRAM制造商长鑫存储(CXMT)的谈判因价格问题陷入停滞。从三星和美光进行供应多元化的进程,在政治和商业层面比预期更为复杂。
简明扼要: 苹果公司与中国国有背景的DRAM生产商长江存储(CXMT)的谈判因价格问题受阻。苹果希望供应链多元化,减少对三星和美光的依赖;长江存储则希望通过苹果订单获得溢价,以反映认证风险及开创性价值。
事实: 长江存储是为数不多接近规模化竞争性DRAM生产的中国企业之一,背后有大量国家投资。苹果采购协议将具有重大地缘政治意义——这是首个一线消费电子企业从中国本土生产商采购DRAM——并将验证长江存储的技术成熟度。
我们的分析: 价格分歧可能是更深层考量的表现:若长江存储的供应链引发监管审查,苹果可能面临出口管制风险;长江存储则希望为其旗舰客户设定参考价格;此外,在中美贸易紧张局势下,苹果与中国供应链关系的政治考量也不容忽视。双方并无结构性利益冲突——只是风险偏好与紧迫性不同。
关注点: 关注苹果产品成本结构(BOM)披露,以及美国商务部对长江存储出口管制状态的任何监管信号。苹果与长江存储的协议将比任何单一协议更快推动DRAM市场重构。
本文由人工智能撰写,并经人工编辑审核。
Isn’t this exactly what the US-China tech decoupling is supposed to fix? Apple seems stuck between cost and risk, and CXMT’s price gap might just be the visible crack in that balancing act.
That price gap isn’t just about decoupling-it’s also Apple hedging bets while CXMT scrambles to prove it can match Samsung and SK Hynix in advanced nodes.
CXMT’s price gap with Samsung or Micron isn’t just about numbers-it’s a strategic gamble. If Apple wants out of China’s supply chain, it’ll have to accept higher costs or risk everything on unproven tech.
Isn’t Apple overestimating the risk? Samsung and Micron’s prices are high, but CXMT’s might not stay that way if they scale up. What if cheaper chips mean better margins long-term?
CXMT’s price might not be the real issue-Apple’s supply chain diversification feels more like damage control than a true pivot. Political leverage will always outweigh cost savings in the long run.
CXMT’s pricing isn’t the only hurdle-Apple’s supply chains already rely too much on China for comfort. Diversification is smart, but is anyone really prepared for the cost of decoupling?
I wonder if Apple’s reluctance to commit is just about price or if they’re also hedging against geopolitical risks by keeping options open.
CXMT’s pricing issue isn’t just about cost-it’s a signal of how deeply Apple’s supply chains still rely on China despite political tensions. Hope they can balance risk and quality.
Price wars aside, isn’t Apple’s real dilemma here whether to bet on China’s long-term stability or play it safe with allies? Political trust seems like a bigger gamble than pricing.
Apple’s supply chain diversification seems less about avoiding China’s pricing and more about not putting all DRAM eggs in China’s basket-geopolitical stability isn’t something you can price.
Capex mémoire : la course aux HBM/DRAM