TransitionReservado a suscriptores Jun 23, 2026 at 21:444Añadir a favoritos

The rise of cobalt-free LFP batteries seemed to resolve dependence on the DRC-but a global analysis reveals that the risk remains intact for high-end EVs and that technological substitution has simply redistributed vulnerabilities.
The global EV industry has massively adopted cobalt-free LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) batteries since 2020-2021, driven by Tesla (standard range lineup) and BYD ("Blade" batteries). This shift appeared to "solve" dependence on Congolese cobalt. However, OilPrice’s June 22, 2026 report highlights that recent supply chain disruptions and the persistence of cobalt in high-density NMC batteries reveal a residual structural vulnerability that markets are underestimating.
The LFP transition has effectively reduced exposure in the mass market. But it has created a de facto bifurcation: long-range EVs (premium SUVs >600 km, heavy electric trucks) remain dependent on high-nickel NMC and its cobalt. Concentration in the DRC and geopolitical tensions-chronic political instability (M23, Russian military presence), reinforced Chinese industrial presence in mines-maintain a structural risk not reflected in current prices.
The mechanism is one of false resilience: players solved the cobalt issue for the low-end but shifted it to the premium segment, precisely where margins are highest and economic dependence most critical. The rise of recycling (second-life batteries, hydrometallurgy) is real, but integration speed remains insufficient for projected 2030 volumes (+300% cobalt demand in IEA’s NZE scenario).
Historical parallel: dependence on lead in 1970s paints-gradually substituted but with a long tail of residual risk in old stocks. Here, cobalt in existing and deploying NMC fleets represents this "long tail."
Position non-DRC cobalt producers as partial hedges rather than core holdings: Glencore (GLEN, LSE)-world’s top cobalt producer with diversified exposure; juniors in Australia, the Philippines, and Morocco. For OEMs, favor those most advanced in LFP/sodium diversification (BYD, Tesla) over those still reliant on premium NMC (Mercedes, BMW). ESG: the EU’s CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive) mandates due diligence on DRC cobalt supply chains starting in 2026.
Faster-than-expected technological substitution (cobalt-free solid-state batteries-Toyota, QuantumScape, SES AI) could render the cobalt thesis obsolete before 2030. Symmetric downside risk: oversupply of artisanal cobalt not captured in official statistics. Structural ESG risk: child labor in DRC artisanal mines (ASM)-growing regulatory and supply chain accountability pressure.
Crea una cuenta gratuita para acceder a todos nuestros contenidos y a la revista semanal.
Artículo producido por inteligencia artificial, revisado bajo control editorial humano.
Inicia sesión para unirte a la conversación.
LFP réduit le cobalt, pas le risque géopolitique sur le lithium. La diversification des sources reste la seule vraie solution.
LFP csökkentette a kockázatot, de a nyersanyagfüggőség csak áttevődött - a VE-s álom még mindig törékeny.
La dependencia del litio en LFP es solo otro cuello de botella; China domina el 80% del refinado (USGS 2025). El riesgo no desaparece, se traslada.
Permettez-moi de douter... Si le cobalt quitte la RDC pour le lithium chilien, on a juste changé de dictature minière. Le risque n’a pas bougé, il a mis les voiles.
Cobalto y VE: el riesgo de suministro fantasma