Infra & Compute il y a 11 min10Ajouter aux favoris

Samsung is planning to build HBM5's base die on its 2nm process, with a 50% speed uplift target. Memory is no longer just chasing capacity - it's chasing logic-node economics.
In plain terms - Samsung will build the base die of its next-generation HBM5 memory on its 2nm GAA process node - a logic-class node - to hit a 50%+ speed uplift over HBM4E.
ETNews reports (27 July 2026) that Samsung is pushing HBM5 base die to a 2nm gate-all-around (GAA) process. Koo Ja-geum, VP at Samsung's Foundry Business, said via the company newsroom that HBM5 is expected to need a 50%+ speed uplift over its immediate predecessor HBM4E, and that the base die's node choice is driven by both speed and power efficiency. Tech in Asia corroborates the 50%+ vs HBM4E framing. HBM5 succeeds HBM4E (itself a step beyond HBM4), which is still in ramp phase across SK Hynix / Samsung / Micron.
The base die is the logic layer that sits under stacked DRAM dies and orchestrates the interface with the GPU. Historically it was built on trailing-edge nodes because DRAM economics dominated. Moving base die to 2nm GAA - the same node used for leading logic chips - signals two things: (1) HBM interface bandwidth is now the binding constraint, not capacity; (2) Samsung is willing to spend logic-node wafers on memory, which reshapes fab allocation across foundries.
Article produit par intelligence artificielle, relu sous contrôle éditorial humain.
Connectez-vous pour rejoindre la discussion.
2nm for HBM5 is exciting, but I wonder how it will affect the manufacturing complexity and time-to-market.
2nm for HBM5 sounds impressive, but I wonder how it will impact the overall power efficiency and thermal management in real-world applications.
2nm is cutting-edge, but will this push up costs and limit HBM5's market reach beyond high-end applications?
Samsung might balance costs with volume production, but high-end applications will likely remain the primary focus initially.
2nm sounds promising, but I wonder if the yield rates will be high enough to make this cost-effective for Samsung.
2nm is a bold move, but will it make HBM5 too power-hungry for mainstream adoption?
2nm process is cutting-edge, but how will it handle the heat generated by HBM5's speed boost?
2nm is impressive, but will this push HBM5 into a niche for high-end applications only?
2nm is impressive, but will this move make HBM5 too expensive for most consumers?
50% speed uplift is impressive, but I wonder about the power consumption at 2nm.
50% speed boost is great, but will this make HBM5 more expensive? Cost is a big factor for many applications.
Capex mémoire : la course aux HBM/DRAM